Looking back on the ordeal, there are a number of things I would have
done differently – not the least of which is slipping on a pair
of sneakers. I'd have used a broom and dustpan to collect the serrated
pieces of decorative glass instead of my bare hands. Come to think of
it, I could have opened the blinds to shed a little more light on the
subject.
There's no better
way to demonstrate your intelligence than assuming the role of Monday
morning quarterback. After all, you will never have a greater understanding
of a particular event than you do after the outcome has been determined.
And when the result
is less than desirable, there is plenty of room for second guessing. It's
easy to lay claim to the perfect solution after all the facts are in.
Like explaining to my wife the usefulness of a potholder while she's running
her scalded fingers under cold water.
The current MasterCard
commercial featuring Brett Favre is hilarious. Some poor schlemiel walks
out of the market, his groceries fall through the bottom of a paper sack
onto the sidewalk and Brett says "I'd have double bagged it."
Just the kind of comment
one wants to hear while trying to corral the runaway tangerines and the
extra-large tube of Preparation H. Personally, I would have had a few
choice words for Brett about what to do with his hind-sighted advice.
In real life, Favre's
coach Mike Sherman was criticized after the Packers' 20-17 overtime playoff
loss to the Eagles for a decision he made late in the game. Up 17-14 with
2:30 remaining, Sherman decided to punt on fourth-and-1 from the Philadelphia
41-yard line.
Had he gone for, and
made, a first down, the Packers could have run out the clock. Then again,
had his offense been stopped on fouth-and-1, the Eagles would have gotten
the ball back in great field position. In hindsight, he should have gone
for it since the Packers lost the game anyway.
In St. Louis, Rams
coach Mike Martz was scorched by the Monday morning media for not trying
to score a last-second, game-winning touchdown against the Carolina Panthers.
Instead, Martz elected to kick a game-tying field goal. The Rams lost
in overtime, so hindsight would dictate that he should have made an attempt
to get the ball into the end zone.
Not only was Martz'
football intelligence called into question, but his manhood as well. What
would the pundits have said had Martz called for a game-winning pass play
and the Panthers intercepted?
For NFL head coaches,
it's always a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't."
At some point in a game, they have to make decision that will inevitably
affect the outcome. If the team wins, you're a genius. But if the team
winds up losing, you're a dunce.
I don't think anyone
would dispute the fact that Vince Lombardi was football genius. In nine
years with the Green Bay Packers, Lombardi won five NFL Championships
and the first two Super Bowls.
He was on the sideline
for one of football's greatest post-season games - the 1967 NFL Championship
against the Dallas Cowboys. Better known as the Ice Bowl because the game-time
temperature reached minus-13 degrees, Lombardi and the Packers beat the
Cowboys 21-17.
The Packers were down
17-14 with 13 seconds left and no time outs. Lombardi called for Bart
Starr to run a quarterback sneak from the 1-yard line. Had Starr not made
it over the goal line, time would have expired and the Cowboys would have
been off to Super Bowl II.
The Monday morning
quarterbacks would have had a field day with the league's premier coach
for passing up the opportunity to tie the game with a chip-shot field
goal. I can see the headlines: Lombardi Shoulda…
*********************
|