Los Angeles Lakers star center Shaquille O'Neal received a one game suspension
without pay – that's $295,000, or a three bedroom house, if you
were wondering - Monday by the NBA league office for "using obscene
language and publicly criticizing the officials during a television interview,"
according to a SI.com article posted on February 2.
Owners and coaches
are routinely fined by the league for their public condemnation of the
officials. Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban as donated hundreds of thousands
of dollars due to what NBA commissioner David Stern calls "outrageous
behavior."
Cuban, and many others
are often outraged by what can only be described as an epidemic of lousy
officiating. This phenomenon is not exclusive to the NBA. Basketball referees
at all levels are equally as bad. Just ask Texas Tech coach Bobby Knight.
Or ask the coach of
the Galena High School freshman basketball team. I've been to just about
every hoops contest they've had this season and it's evident by the crowd's
reaction - from the opening tip to the final buzzer - that the referees
have blown every single call.
Every loss the team
has experienced this season can be directly attributed to the referees;
and, of course, every win has been well earned despite the blatant one-sidedness
of the deaf, dumb and blind boobs calling the game.
If the parents of
14-year old boys refuse to tolerate incompetent officiating, then how
can we expect a super star like Shaq to remain silent? Isn't it the right
– or duty – of every coach and owner to point out the many
shortcomings of the men who control the game's outcome?
In the NBA, three
people, supposedly the tops in their field, are paid to watch 10 men,
also the tops in their field, play basketball; and blow the whistle when
they see an infraction of the rules. Doesn't seem like a difficult task.
Ten guys, one ball
and 94 feet of hardwood to cover. So why is it that every time they blow
the whistle, fifty percent of the people watching the very same game disagree
with the call? It all shouldn't be so confusing. Thankfully, there have
been a few rules changes since Dr. James Naismith first came up with the
idea of tossing a ball into a basket.
Changes that make
the task of refereeing even easier than it was in the early 1890's. Naismith's
original game was played nine-on-nine. Eighteen players on the court at
the same time – you can imagine the chaos.
Modern officials don't
have a clue how good they have it. How many different fouls do you think
were committed every time eighteen guys went up for a rebound? A ball
handler couldn't go two feet in any direction without bumping into another
player.
Add a couple of players
to each side and you've got a football game; but a football field is almost
nine times the size of a basketball court. Back then, referees probably
spent most of the game just trying to get the heck out of the way. Try
calling a double dribble when eighteen large men are stampeding from one
basket to the other.
On January 16, 1896,
the University of Chicago beat a YMCA team 15-12 in the first five-on-five
basketball game. It wouldn't surprise me if it was a referee that suggested
pulling the other eight guys off the court.
With less clutter
on the court, it's no wonder that Shaq gets a little miffed when he is
mugged under the basket and nobody with a whistle sees it (that is, nobody
with a whistle sees it his way).
I'm not sure the officiating
would be any better even if there were only three players on each side.
The referees are going to be criticized by players, coaches, owners and
fans as long as they continue to shamelessly favor the other team.
*********************
|