Except
the Hall of Fame Selection Board should take a year off every once in
a while.
You
have to send in your 1040 to the IRS every April. You don't (or at least
you shouldn't) have to pick a new class to enter the Pro Football Hall
of Fame every Super Bowl weekend.
There
is nothing written in the Selection Board rulebook that requires them
to name a minimum number of new members every year. But, according to
the HOF web site (www.profootballhof.com) "the Board's current ground
rules do stipulate that between four and seven new members will be selected
each year".
As a fan, as a football historian, and as a taxpayer I have to ask why?
The
five new inductees, Jim Kelly, Dave Casper, Dan Hampton, John Stallworth
and George Allen bring the total HOF membership to 216.
Are
the Board members paid by the bust? (Are one or more of them in the bust
making business?) Already we know that in 2003 the total will rise to
at least 220. At some point being selected will cease to be special. At
some point it will become ordinary.
At
some point the Selection Board will have to realize that the HOF is not
the IRS - there are no have to's.
Jim
Kelly looks pretty good when you compare him to the other fifteen finalists
and you have to pick somebody.
But
what happens if the Board stacks Kelly up against Unitas and Starr and
Staubach and Montana? How does he look then?
I
think that if you have to "make a case" for someone's selection, then
he's probably not a true Hall of Fame candidate.
The
thirteen members of the 1963 Hall of Fame Charter Class were all selected
unanimously. They weren't just the cream of the crop, they were the crème
de la crème. Nobody had to "make a case" for these men.
John
Stallworth has been a finalist for induction for twelve years. Like an
IRS auditor picking through a really bad tax return, twelve years of indecision
throws up a big red flag.
Many
are wondering what, in the name of Deacon Jones and "Mean" Joe Greene,
Dan Hampton is doing on that list of new members. You can "make a case"
for Hampton, but it is the same case that can be made for a dozen other
defensive lineman that aren't and shouldn't be in the Hall of Fame.
Hall
of Fame members should jump right out at you. When Jerry Rice's name hits
the list of nominations, it will leap off the page and slap each Selection
Board member upside the head.
When
new Hall of Fame members are announced, their career summaries should
be dripping with words like 'immortal' and 'legendary'. When I hear 'consistent',
'durable' and 'hard working' (all admirable qualities), I think of a Craftsman
power tool and not the next Pro Football Hall of Fame inductee.
The
HOF web site states that the Board is "charged with the vital task of
continuing to be certain that new enshrinees are the finest the game has
produced".
Self-imposing
a yearly four-man minimum makes that task impossible. Selecting "the finest
the game has produced" gives way to simply choosing the 'best available'
from the current nominations.
Future
Hall of Fame defensive backs should have their credentials measured against
those of Night Train Lane, not Lester Hayes.
Linebackers
have to stand shoulder to shoulder with Dick Butkus and Ray Nitschke not
Darryl Talley and Matt Millen.
And
if they can't bring themselves to mention Kelly in the same breath with
Van Brocklin and Jurgensen then they shouldn't bother trying to "make
a case" for his selection.
At
least they shouldn't have to!
If,
at the end of the day, there doesn't seem to be any clear-cut, qualified
candidates to include among the best of the best, then cancel the pre-Super
Bowl announcement ceremony.
And
wait 'till next year. Or the year after that. Sooner or later Jerry Rice
and Dan Marino will appear on the nomination list.
Meanwhile,
they can pass the time by filing their tax returns early.
Something
they have to do anyway.
*********************
|