This year's game will feature 29 first-timers. Young, hungry, up-and-coming
stars of the future. Should be great. Should be very competitive –
especially with the newly added incentive. Should elevate the game –
not to mention the television ratings, right?
After all, last year's
game was the lowest-rated prime time All-Star broadcast in history. I
guess a few changes were in order. I have to wonder why Selig thinks because
the game is now more important to the eventual A.L. and N.L pennant winners,
it will somehow be more interesting for the fans.
You know what would
interest me? Roger Clemens facing Barry Bonds with men on first and second.
What a great match-up. You know he isn't going to walk him. It's power
against power and may the best man win. But we won't get to see it because
Clemens didn't make the roster.
I'd like to see Rafael
Palmeiro take a couple of cuts at Kerry Wood's fastball. The man just
became the latest member of baseball's 500 Home Run Club. Why shouldn't
he be displaying his talents on Tuesday night?
I know we all cringe
a little at the sight of Palmeiro now that he's doing Viagra commercials.
Nobody really wants to think about a baseball star with Erectile Dysfunction,
but give the guy his due.
The All-Star game
is an exhibition. A mid-season break that affords Major League Baseball
the opportunity to showcase the best it has to offer. Instead we get Armando
Benitez, Mike Williams and Rondell White. Where is Pedro Martinez and
his three Cy Young Awards?
This game isn't -
or shouldn't be - about winning and losing. This game is about history.
There's a reason Cal Ripken and Tony Gwinn were there two years ago. It's
their lifetime contribution to the game, and the fact that they were fan
favorites that got them to SAFECO Field.
Selig doesn't get
it. The All-Star game is losing its popularity because baseball is losing
its popularity. Not because the game has no meaning. Not because the outcome
really isn't important.
Babe Ruth played in
the first All-Star game at Comisky Park in 1933. He was 38-years old,
his best years were well behind him, and he stole the show. He hit the
first home run in All-Star history and led the American League to a 4-2
victory.
He'd be back at age
39 for the second All-Star game in 1934 midway through his last season
as a Yankee. A season in which he hit a seventeen-year-low 22 home runs.
But what would that game have been without him?
In 1973, 42-year old
Willie Mays appeared in 66 games for the New York Mets. He batted .211,
hit six home runs and had 25 RBI. Oh yeah, he also made his 24th consecutive
All-Star appearance.
Do you think any of
the 40,849 baseball fans packed into Royals Stadium in Kansas City cared
about Willie's stats? They must have had chills when he came up to bat
for the last time in the eighth inning. At least I would have. By the
way, I don't have a clue – nor do I care - who won the game.
If Elvis were alive
today he'd be 68-years old and probably weigh about 400 pound but he'd
still be swiveling his hips to a packed house. Sure women would be throwing
control-top granny pants on stage now – and that's pretty disgusting
- but he'd still be the King.
There is plenty of
room on each 32-man roster for the seasonal All-Star. But there should
always be room for the game's perennial stars as well. It's a much better
way to peak fan interest than trying to impose more importance on the
game.
It's obvious that
Bud Selig and Major League Baseball want desperately to win back the hearts,
minds and wallets of the American fans. Melvin Mora just ain't gonna get
it done.
*********************
|