OK, the driver doesn't retail for anything close to $20 million. But it's
been reported that Tiger is raking in that much each year to endorse Nike
golf equipment and apparel. So it doesn't bode well for team Swoosh that
he used the Titleist again this past week at the Buick Open where he finished
second.
Something tells me
Nike executives are on their knees thanking the golf gods that Tiger wasn't
able to complete a weekend rally to overtake Buick Champion Jim Furyk.
As it is, the driver change was big news in the golf world, and bad news
for the shoe company's relatively new golf division.
Nothing says "your
equipment stinks" louder and more convincingly than the world's greatest
golfer taking it out of his bag because he can't hit it. Contrary to what
the Nike spin-doctors are saying, this has got to be the company's worst
nightmare.
What golfer in his
or her right mind is going to rush down to the sporting goods store and
spend a couple of hundred bucks on a driver that even Tiger Woods has
trouble hitting? Not me. Not you. And with the world-wide publicity "the
switch" has produced, nobody from Japan to Scotland either.
But don't take my
word for it. Golfdigest.com is running a poll that asks "Do you think
Nike will see a significant decrease in driver sales after Tiger Wood's
decision to go back to his Titleist driver?" Over 73% of respondents
voted 'Yes'.
When Phil Mickelson
suggested that Tiger's "slump" may be due, in part, to his use
of inferior equipment, the media went berserk on the Major-less lefty.
Now the idea doesn't seem so absurd.
A Nike executive recently
pointed out that Tiger has won many tournaments using their equipment.
Well, Tiger is probably capable of winning tournaments using a garden
hoe and a pool cue. I, on the other hand, need all the technological help
I can get just to break 90. When I'm shopping around for the next "latest
and greatest", I'll probably stay away from the Nike rack. I'll go
with – oh, I don't know, there are so many brands to choose from
– Titleist perhaps.
Can it get any worse
for a sponsor than to have its premier endorser reveal to the world that
there's something better? Do you think Buick would be mildly upset if
Tiger was seen cruising around in a Cadillac?
I imagine there would
be some tense moments in the board room if Shaq comes down with a severe
strain of E.coli a few hours after filming a new Burger King commercial.
Of course, there might be a spike in the sale of Big Macs and Happy Meals.
It must have been
a coup for American Express to land Lance Armstrong after winning his
fifth straight Tour de France. But the move could backfire if he puts
that celebratory trip to Disney Land on his Visa card.
And what would we
– the consumers - think if it was discovered that Marion Jones –
track star and Got Milk? Spokesperson – is lactose intolerant? It
wouldn't be good for business to find out that cute little white mustache
was made from a soy substitute.
Next week's PGA Championship
at Oak Hill Country Club in Rochester, New York is Tiger's last chance
to win a Major in 2003. It's been five years since Tiger was shut out
at all four Majors.
He's sure to show
up at Oak Hill with his "A game" and his trusty old Titleist
975D driver. If he wins, there will be some that will credit the driver
switch. If he loses, he may decide to toss the Nike irons and balls out
of his bag as well.
Either way, the only
time you'll see the Swoosh logo at a golf course any time soon will be
on one of those nifty short-sleeve, mock-turtle neck shirts that Tiger
wears so well. Maybe $90 million basketball phenom LeBron James will sell
enough sneakers to cover Nike's golf losses.
Unless he's seen walking
around the mall wearing those spiffy new Adidas cross-trainers.
*********************
|