| Certainly a
good rule of thumb to follow while concocting a poll question is to make
sure there is no quantifiable answer.
"What do you think is
the sum total of two and two?" is a silly poll question (made even
more ridiculous when 'four' doesn't appear as one of the possible responses).
This past week, an internet
sports site asked the poll question "Which of these players should
be considered the greatest home run hitter in MLB history?" With
the four possible responses being Hank Aaron, Barry Bonds, Willie Mays
or Babe Ruth.
The question is absurd. The
answer – the only answer – is obvious, quantifiable and irrefutable.
The greatest home run hitter in MLB history is the guy with the most home
runs. (For those of you who are new to our planet, that would be Hank
Aaron with 755).
Poll responses should be debatable;
the answer to this question is not open for discussion.
With Barry Bonds on the verge
of hitting the 600 home run mark, I'm sure the writer thought it was timely
and relevant. It's not. Bond's will need to stay healthy and productive
for at least three more seasons to catch Aaron. If he does, then he'll
be the "greatest home run hitter in MLB history" – but
it still doesn't make a good poll question.
Somebody needs to set down
some ground rules for these pollsters. By a show of hands, how many of
you think that somebody should be me? Very good, I accept.
Let's start by reviewing rule
number one. No poll question should be asked if there is a single correct
answer especially if that answer can be found in a sports almanac.
Rule number two addresses another
poll peeve I have. Always give the person participating in the poll at
least one choice that will appeal to him or her. For example:
What was your reaction to the
news that Tonya Harding will have to undergo alcohol rehabilitation in
order to avoid going to prison?
A) Shock
B) Disappointment
C) Sadness
D) Who gives a hoot about a washed-up, has-been figure skater and why
are you wasting my time with this question.
Here's another (because the
lack of logical answers really irks me and I want them to get it right):
What was your reaction to the
news that John Rocker called a gay couple 'fruitcakes' at a Dallas eatery
last week?
A) Shock
B) Disappointment
C) Sadness
D) Who gives a hoot about a washed-up, has-been relief pitcher and why
are you wasting my time with this question.
And rule number three: it's
shameful to list only those response choices that will enable you to manipulate
a favorable outcome (also known as the Bill Clinton Polling Technique).
In other words, this is a no-no:
What did you think of this
year's Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue?
A) Couldn't put it down
B) Put it under my pillow
C) Had it bound in leather
D) Had it bound in leather and put it under my pillow
And though the following satisfies
rule number two, it is still shameful manipulation of the polling process:
Some 'experts' say that Bud
Selig should step down as the commissioner of baseball if there is a work
stoppage. What do you think he should do?
A) step off a building
B) step in front of a bus
C) step behind a kicking mule
D) step down Hogan's Alley for a little man to man
(You see, poll results, like
accounting ledgers, can be very easy to manipulate.)
This last rule is specifically
aimed toward the internet pollsters: Don't launch a thousand pop-up ads
in my browser window every time I answer one of your ridiculous poll questions!
Come to think of it, maybe
these sports sites should eliminate their silly little polls altogether.
It's just a big waste of time and I doubt anyone really cares about my
opinion.
By the way, don't
forget to rate this week's Hogan's Alley using the form at the top of
this page. Thanks.
*********************
|