Now Paul Hamm can leave Athens with his well deserved gold medal and head
back to Waukesha, Wisconsin to celebrate his historic triumph with friends
and family. People who won't criticize or question the outcome of the
men's gymnastics all-around finals.
He can leave the judging
error that cost the Korean bronze medallist a tenth of a point on the
parallel bars – and the controversy that ensued – far behind.
He can revel in his victory and treasure that which USAToday columnist
Christine Brennan has the audacity to refer to as "the medal that
we now know was given incorrectly to Hamm."
The tenth of a point
that was erroneously deducted from Yang Tae-young during his parallel
bar routine would have been enough to vault (pardon the pun) the Korean
ahead of Hamm in the all-around standings. Therefore, according to Brennan,
"Hamm should give his gold medal to Yang."
What a brilliant piece
of advice. "Yang would have won," Brennan claims, and "Hamm
would have earned the silver." It seems Ms. Brennan is not only a
sportswriter, she's also a prophet. Able to predict the "correct"
outcome of the men's all-around after five of the six gymnastics routines
had been performed by the competitors.
Using Brennan's logic,
it's safe to assume that, had Yang been awarded a 9.812 on the parallel
bars instead of 9.712, every other aspect of the competition would have
played out exactly as it did. Hamm would have gotten a 9.837 and Yang
a 9.475 on the final event, the horizontal bars. Yang would have won gold
and Hamm silver.
Yea, and if Grady
Little had pulled Pedro Martinez in the eight inning, the Red Sox would
have won the Pennant against the Yankees last year. If Steve Bartman hadn't
interfered with a foul ball, the Cubs would have been World Series bound.
It's that simple.
If the referees had
made the right call two years ago, the Giants would have kicked the game-winning
field goal against the 49er's in the playoffs. Come to think of it, they
probably would have beaten Tampa Bay the following week and went on to
win the Super Bowl. The Buccaneers should give their championship rings
to the Giants!
After all, the next
day, the officials acknowledged a mistake was made, and yet the NFL did
nothing to rectify the outcome of the game. That's, to borrow a word from
Ms. Brennan's column, inexcusable. At least to Giants fans it is.
The International
Gymnastics Federation, referred to as FIG (shouldn't that be IGF), acknowledged
the mistake and suspended three judges. Brennan claims that "FIG's
action is inexcusable. You acknowledge a mistake was made – and
then you do nothing about the result?"
The fact is that nobody
– not even the oracular Christine Brennan – can predict what
would have happened on the horizontal bar had Yang been awarded another
tenth on the parallel bars. Maybe Hamm does something even more extraordinary,
maybe Yang succumbs to the pressure of being that much closer to a gold
medal, maybe the judges give Hamm the marks he needs to beat Yang anyway.
Brennan doesn't know
what would have happened any more than I do, yet she decided that the
honorable thing for Hamm to do would be to give up his hard earned medal
"because it was the right thing to do."
The right thing for
whom? The truly right thing to do is to let the results stand as they
are and let Hamm take his proper place in Olympic history – untarnished.
The right thing to do would be to put this kid's face on a Wheaties box,
not goad him into thinking that keeping his medal is wrong.
There's no good reason
for Paul Hamm to give up his Olympic gold medal. And there's no excusable
reason for anyone – his mother, his coach or FIG – to try
to shame him into forfeiting something that is rightfully his; least of
all a sportswriter.
*********************
|