Women sports fans are no different than their male counterparts. Given
the opportunity, they will always choose to watch the far superior Los
Angeles Lakers rather than the (WNBA) Los Angeles Sparks. And it will
stay that way until somebody – anybody – on the Sparks is
capable of dunking over Shaq.
As far as the WUSA
is concerned, no soccer league – male or female – can compete
with the 'Big 4' professional sports leagues that dominate the networks,
the sports pages and the internet sports sites. (And that doesn't include
the extremely popular, male dominated NASCAR circuit.)
It is extremely short-sighted
(some may even call it sexist) for the organizers of the WNBA and WUSA
to build extravagant professional leagues around the idea that women will
want to watch because it is women that are playing.
Women sports fans
are far too knowledgeable and far too savvy to fall for such a transparent
marketing ploy. They watch Sportscenter. They read Sports Illustrated.
They know good sports when they see it. They grew up rooting for the Cubs
and the Raiders and the Celtics.
They compete in the
office football pool and the online fantasy leagues. They're at the bar
for the Monday Night Football dollar beer and chicken wing specials. They
yell at the television set and, like I wrote last June, "they know
when the offense is offside and a pass interference call when they see
one."
It has long been noted
that male sportsfans are obsessively fanatical about the teams they root
for. In the spirit of gender equality, female sportsfans have attained
a similar rabid affection for their teams.
Why should they settle
for – no offense ladies – the inferior competition of the
WNBA or sit through a two hour soccer game just because the participants
have breasts and know what it's like to experience child birth?
As long as football
and baseball remain America's favorite sports pastimes; as long as men
continue to play football and baseball better than women; women are infinitely
more likely to watch the World Series over the World Cup and any Sunday
football game over the WNBA Championship.
A better target market
for the likes of the WUSA would be the small group of men willing to endure
a women's soccer game just on the off chance that Brandi Chastain may
take her shirt off after scoring a goal.
Again in the spirit
of gender equality, many female sportsfans would much rather watch finely-tuned
male athletes than see Chastain celebrating in her sports bra. Evidence
of this came during Wednesday night's Oakland-Boston division series game
when my wife declared: "boy that (A's pitcher) Tim Hudson is one
good looking guy."
Women's professional
sports leagues face an uphill battle trying to find a loyal audience.
Men won't watch once the sex appeal loses its – well – appeal.
Women who watch sports won't be easily swayed just because Mia Hamm uses
the same feminine hygiene product.
And, unlike male sportsfans
who can sit through 48 straight hours of ESPN programming, female sportsfans
are, as a group, more interesting and well rounded. They have hobbies.
The go shopping – and enjoy it. They have scrapbooking parties.
They read books. Real books, not Mike Ditka's biography and the 2003 Sports
Almanac.
And sometimes when
they want to be left alone and have a good cry, they'll watch a tear-jerking
Lifetime original movie, not the Red Sox bullpen blow another late-inning
lead. For the female fan, there's simply too much to do before the Buccaneers
kick off to squeeze in a basketball game featuring one player that can
actually touch the rim.
Oh, there's another
reason why female sportfans will never jump on any women's league bandwagon.
And it has nothing to do with the players' physical ability – or
lack there of, any lifelong team allegiance or Tim Hudson's firm buns.
It's simply because female sportsfans don't have control of the television
remote. Not in my house.
*********************
|