That said…
My blood's been boiling
all week reading one column after another about "the stupid fans", "the
unruly fans", "the ugly fans" and "the raucous fans". (I confess I had
to look up the word 'raucous' - it means "boisterously disorderly".)
Just about every pompous,
glorified stat-rat with a word processor, a thesaurus and an audience
has taken a pot shot at "the fans".
Cleveland Browns Stadium
holds 73,200 people, the Superdome in New Orleans - 70,200. A couple of
hundred (heck, call it a thousand) get out of control and the entire group
draws the ire of sportswriters coast to coast.
Now football fans
- en masse - are being identified by words like "mob", "morons" and "animals".
I take exception.
Why are these over-opinionated,
wannabe jocks jumping all over the entire NFL fan base because of the
actions of a relative few?
Well, one reason is
that the fan is an easy target. The fan, you see, has no real outlet for
rebuttal. I do. (Be it a small one - for now).
To these arrogant
"know-it-alls", fans are nameless, fans are faceless, and fans are voiceless.
Perched high above the general population in a climate controlled press
box, one fan seems more or less like the next.
A bottle goes flying
in Cleveland and seventy-two thousand people are to blame. "Shut down
the beer taps, these people are out of control". "Better put all the drinks
in plastic cups, we're dealing with animals here". "And take away those
big foam fingers before somebody loses an eye".
And of course these
"writers" have to bring up that "ugly" snowball-throwing debacle at Giants
Stadium six years ago. (What they fail to tell you every time they have
occasion to mention the incident is that for every idiot tossing a snowball,
there were a hundred others trying to get them to stop and pointing out
the perps to security. I guess that wouldn't make good copy.)
Seventeen million
people attend football games in this country every year. Over a hundred
million have attended games between the 1995 snowball "riot" and the 2001
bottle throwing "melee". And these guys have spent the last five days
and thousands of words condemning "the fans".
Because we are all
alike. We must be. We dress in the same colors. We root for the same team.
We live in the same general area. If one of us tosses a bottle, we all
toss that bottle. And it's the responsibility of the elite, superior sportswriter
to admonish us all.
Maybe it would be
helpful if these guys and gals spent a few games in the stands instead
of the press box. Maybe they would see that the people next to them were
doctors, accountants, office workers, policemen and carpenters.
Maybe they'd realize
that ninety-nine percent of the "raucous crowd" was just average, hard
working individuals out looking for a good time and not out looking for
trouble.
Maybe they would stop
lumping all fans together into one "unruly mob".
It's insulting to
read (over and over) that maybe what "these fans" need is a
heavy dose of "loving you is easy 'cause you're beautiful" instead of
chorus after chorus of "Who Let the Dogs Out".
Because we're mindless
cattle easily worked into an uncontrollable frenzy. If we Woof, we're
"animals". (Of course, if we sit silently, we're apathetic).
I probably wouldn't
mind the criticism as much if these same "writers" put an equal amount
of effort into giving the fans some credit.
There was a packed
house Sunday at the Pontiac Silverdome in Detroit. Fans there to cheer
the 0-12 Lions on to their first victory of the season. Applauding the
effort of their team when it would have been a lot more convenient to
get some Christmas shopping done.
And I haven't read
a single article about the effort football fans have shown this year (and
many years past) supporting the Marine Corp's Toys for Tots program. Thousands
and thousands of gifts dropped off at stadium gates for underprivileged
children.
All fans are not "morons",
"goons", "idiots" or "animals". Some fans are. So are some sportswriters.
Happy Holidays.
*********************
|